Advertisement

City Council considers lowering affordability minimums to build more homes

Waltham’s legislators are considering an adjustment to the city’s affordable housing requirements to incentivize more developers to build affordably.

At the Jan. 20 meeting of the City Council’s Ordinances and Rules Committee, City Solicitor Katherine Laughman presented a series of possible housing reforms suggested by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council.

The city hired the MAPC to evaluate its affordable housing legislation and counsel the city on how to comply with the MTBA Zoning act, Laughman said. The city also asked the MAPC to evaluate how feasible Waltham’s current affordability requirements are for residential construction in the long term.

The organization’s analysis found that Waltham’s current housing requirements were reasonable for small residential developments of eight or fewer units and in some cases for very large developments of 75 units or more. But the costs imposed by the requirements would be prohibitive for many housing developments in between.

In a September email Laughman presented to the committee, the MAPC laid out four policy options it had brainstormed with the city’s Law Department that would better incentivize affordable housing construction in the city through changes to the affordable unit minimums, what units have to cost to be considered affordable, and parking space requirements for new developments to lower their overall cost. 

In all of these cases, the organization calculated whether housing is affordable based on its costing no more than 30% of a household’s monthly income. Units priced for households making up to 80% of the area median income are considered affordable units by the state.

All four MAPC options imposed different requirements on smaller developments of 18 or fewer units and larger developments of 19 or more units, in line with current requirements. At the moment, the city requires that 15% of units in new buildings with eight to 18 units are rated as affordable. In buildings with 19 or more units, developers are required to add an additional 5% of units that would be affordable for households at 50% AMI.

Council President and Ward 9 Councilor Robert G. Logan spoke in favor of the amendments.

“There has not been one single request for a special permit to develop housing of any kind since [the affordable housing requirement] was increased to 20%,” he said.

The Ordinances and Rules Committee agreed to temporarily table the matter so that committee members could consider the proposed options in more detail before the committee’s next meeting.

Advertisement

Summary of affordability requirements for housing development

Development sizeOption 1Option 2Option 3Option 4
Up to 18 units10% of all units in a development must be affordable.
 
of all affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% of the area median income, and the other for residents making 60% AMI.
15% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

All affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI.
10% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

of all affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI, and the other for residents making 50% AMI.

Developers only need to build 1.5 parking spaces per unit in the development, instead two.
15% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

All affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI.
19 or more units15% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

of all affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI, and the other for residents making 60% AMI.
15% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

of all affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI, and the other for residents making 50% AMI.
15% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

of all affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI, and the other for residents making 50% AMI.

Developers only need to build 1.5 parking spaces per unit in the development instead of two.
15% of all units in a development must be affordable. 

½ of all affordable units should be priced for residents making 80% AMI, and the other ½ for residents making 50% AMI.

Developers only need to build one parking space per unit in the development instead of two.

Share anonymous news tips

You can leave a news tip anonymously, but if you would like us to follow up with you, please include your contact information

Author

Artie Kronenfeld is an Arlington and Waltham-based reporter who enjoys writing about policy and administration that affect people’s everyday lives. Previously hailing from Toronto, they’re a former editor-in-chief of the University of Toronto’s flagship student paper The Varsity. You can find them during off-work hours playing niche RPGs, wandering through Haymarket and making extra spreadsheets that nobody asked for.

Comments (0)

There are no comments on this article.

Leave a comment

When commenting, please keep in mind we are a small non-profit focused on serving our community. Our commenting policy is simple:

  1. Common sense civility: we’re all neighbors, but we can disagree.
  2. Full name required: no anonymous comments.
  3. Assume the best of your neighbors.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Last chance for 2x match – NewsMatch ends Dec 31!! →

00
Months
00
Days
00
Hours
00
Minutes
00
Seconds