School Committee clashes with mayor over proposed budget, sides with superintendent
Waltham School Committee members are at odds with Mayor Jeannette A. McCarthy over next year’s budget and, ultimately, on Superintendent Marisa Mendonsa’s plan to turn around Waltham High School’s poor performance.
The committee’s June 3 meeting showcased the rift, as McCarthy proposed a budget that was $7 million less than the one submitted by Mendonsa and that excluded administrative positions sought by the superintendent.
“I think more administration is not the solution,” McCarthy said.
Mendonsa on May 29 proposed a revised $136 million budget for fiscal 2027, which starts July 1. Her budget includes funding for several new administrators.
McCarthy’s counter-recommendation excludes those administrative positions but adds several classroom teaching positions.
All discussion at last week’s School Committee meeting centered on whether to fund the administrators that Mendonsa wants or teachers sought by McCarthy – which ultimately goes to what strategy the public schools will pursue to improve school performance.
The School Committee must resolve that hefty $7 million gap in budgetary strategy before June 15, when the district is required by law to notify school staff of any changes. The mayor is the chair of the School Committee, as outlined in the city charter.
McCarthy’s counter is a standard part of Waltham’s annual budget process. Each of the city’s roughly 30 departments, including the School Department, submits a budget request to the mayor. The mayor then adjusts those figures before they go to the City Council for final approval.
The disputed positions include two assistant principals and an executive director of WHS’s career and technical education program.
Mendonsa said she needs the new administrators on her team to address gaps in oversight and support at WHS. For the CTE director specifically, she said the program was being overseen by a single person who also had other responsibilities, which left students without enough co-op placements or industry partnerships.
“We’ve invested hundreds of millions of dollars into the program. Having one person overseeing that … I do not feel is sufficient,” Mendonsa said.
Mendonsa’s budget also consolidates a director and an administrator of multilingual learners into one position, a consolidation prompted by a drop in the multilingual learner population.
Mendonsa had also considered adding an executive director of operations and an executive director of finance but dropped both before submitting her proposed budget, saying she dropped those after receiving feedback. She did not share details of that feedback at the School Committee meeting
Mayor seeks more teachers
McCarthy said she would not support the administrative additions, citing fiscal concerns. In Massachusetts, cities can only raise property tax revenue by 2.5% per year under Proposition 2 1/2. Because administrative positions become permanent baseline costs that typically grow year over year, McCarthy argued that adding them to an constantly increasing school budget risked pushing city spending beyond what the tax levy could support. That would require a voter-approved override of the cap, or by cutting other city services.
McCarthy said she wants more classroom teachers, asserting that they are core obligations as opposed to multiple administrative roles that can be consolidated.
McCarthy’s proposed budget has funding for three new reading teacher positions at the high school, which she said had been discussed but weren’t included in the first draft for an unknown reason. She also restored four English as a second language teacher positions that were cut in the superintendent’s draft – a move that drew protests from the Waltham Educators Association.
In addition to $4 million in contract increases for union teachers and $250,000 in increases for nonunion teachers, Mendonsa pushed back on the addition of the four ESL teachers, saying they aren’t needed because of the drop in English language learners at the high school.
Strategy disputes
McCarthy said she disagreed with Mendonsa’s strategy. “I cannot continue to support the administrative positions that have been proposed,” she said, questioning whether the new roles were the right solution for the high school’s performance issues.
McCarthy said the existing principals should be doing what the proposed new administrators would be tasked with doing.
She also said she was skeptical that administration drives school success. Teachers, she argued, and the quality of their experience, spur academic excellence in students.
She also said the School Committee should have asked incoming WHS principal William Conard, who was hired in May, if he wanted the new administrators.
McCarthy also charged that there were communication failures in the school system, pointing to approximately $160,000 in classroom supply funds that were unspent as of last week as evidence. She said more layers of administration would not solve that problem.
Four School Committee members pushed back against McCarthy’s stance against adding new administrative positions. They argued that simply adding more teachers would be insufficient to address the high school’s low performance in recent years.
“The way that our high school is working, is not working,” said Tammy Wong-Bigelow.
Edmund Tarallo said he backed Mendonsa and her budget. “We’ve put a lot of time into Dr. Mendonsa’s vision for our school district. We need more people to put our ducks in the right row. I think that’s what [Mendonsa’s] budget is doing. For now, this is what our schools need to get to the next level,” he said.
Though he acknowledged that a larger budget would mean asking more from taxpayers, Tarallo argued the spending was essential for student success. “If I need to build a fence around my yard to keep my kids safe, I’m going to build a fence. Whether it costs more than I want to spend right now or not, I have to do what we need to do,” he said.
Tarallo, who is currently dean of students at Peabody Veterans Memorial High School, told McCarthy that as someone who works in a high school every day, the extra leadership was necessary. “What we need is more assistance for the needs of our students,” he said. “I don’t know if we’re going to need it forever, but I think right now we’re at a critical time when we need that support.”
In response, McCarthy at one point asked, “What’s wrong with Waltham High School?”
She later added, “I understand the School Committee, respectfully, disagrees. But I’m speaking on behalf of that high school. I am, and will continue to.”
The School Committee has scheduled an emergency session for June 10 to discuss how it will close the gap between Mendonsa’s and McCarthy’s proposed budgets.
Comments (7)
Comments are closed.

Thank you for the article on this critical issue. I hope you will continue reporting until it is resolved.
I would challenge the assumption that adding more teachers and decreasing class size is the only research-backed way to improve student outcomes. In fact, New York City is a prime example of a district that focused obsessively on lowering class sizes, resulting in the highest per pupil spending of any major city (~$45,000), very low teacher-student ratios (15:1), and…worse outcomes than its major city peers.
I think administrators unfairly get a bad rap in education. Sure, ineffective administrators add costly bloat. But highly effective administrators are crucial in any district, and especially one the size of Waltham. Just like in any successful organization, senior leaders set the overall strategy, look at the big picture, get ahead of emerging trends, and make sure everyone is rowing in the same direction. Particularly with the unfortunate recent high turnover of WHS principals, a strong administrative layer under the Superintendent and Principal is necessary to ensure continuity. Teachers cannot be expected to take on administrative duties on top of their extremely demanding classroom workloads.
Waltham’s impressive CTE program, supported through major investments in workspaces in the new building, should absolutely have a senior CTE administrator running the show so Waltham can be an even stronger CTE standout in the region.
I think many Waltham residents, including myself, would consider paying higher taxes to improve the schools, and especially WHS. Bottom 10% in Mass is not Waltham strong and should not be tolerated!
We are in the bottom 10% and continue to spend in the top in this state. Explain to me why we need more admin? More teachers in classroom gives more access to our kids. Last time I checked kids don’t learn from someone in the office. Teachers are the way out of this mess we are in. Hold teachers responsible and change the culture. Hold them accountable for the lack of learning. The Mayor is 100% right! I do not support raising taxes. This superintendent is going to be the highest paid employee. She is getting 10% percent raises for the next two years. That’s on top of moving expenses that were paid for her to move her. What has she done to deserve that. More admin to lessen her work? The teachers got a 2.5% raise. Hold bad teacher responsible and award the good ones. There is zero accountability to preforming poorly. Both teachers and the superintendent. Until that happens the results will be the same. Thank you Mayor for not throwing bad money after bad money. Thank you Mayor for protecting the taxpayers money
I absolutely agree with Mr. Goodwin and the Mayor. We already have plenty of administrators and no one seems to be able to quantify their value. Houston, Texas school district has done a fantastic job increase the “learning” of their students by reducing administrators/consultants and focusing on the classroom. No need to continue to add to the education/industrial complex.
I agree it’d be better to have more teachers – and certainly more ESL teachers than extra admin. Fixing student to teacher ratios goes a long way to helping students where they need it most by someone who is physically in the classroom with them and helps teachers from being overwhelmed. Looking at the cost difference too, it seems like a no brainer to hire more teachers. Perhaps a compromise can be reached, some new admin positions and a few more teachers?
Mayor McCarthy’s recommendation to add teachers, not more administrators, is the responsible decision. Lowering the student/ teacher ratio in each classroom is the overwhelmingly recognized research-based answer to increasing student learning.
Steve Goodwin Sr.
Not wishing to delve into the entire budget issue, I would comment on one area that being ESL. I agree with the Mayor that more ESL teachers should be hired. I think Superintendent Mendosa is off base when she stated no additional ESL teachers were needed due to a drop in English Language learners. One only has to venture into Hannaford’s or Market Basket to see the number and diversity of immigrants in our city. It is this population that makes Waltham such a wonderful place to live and offering additional ESL resources makes an abundance of sense.
Thanks for this important info! I have emailed the Mayor asking her to reconsider her counter, which sounds detrimental. More teachers are needed, but admins can be strong pillars and can offer strong support to struggling students AND teachers.